A Patient with Dysphagia


Facilitating Learning Session
with

Participants (mostly surgical trainees with some certified general surgeons)
in the
Postgraduate Course of the Department of Surgery, Philippine General Hospital
Manila

September 7, 1999

9 Participants
Drs. Randy Abdulla, Janice Maddela, Marlo Rendon, Merceditha Althea Quinon,
Luis Serafin C. Dabao, Romulo Barrameda, Jr., Gemma Uy, Arlean, and others

(from Laguna, Polymedic Medical Center, Iloilo, Tondo Medical Center)

Facilitator: Reynaldo O. Joson, MD


Notes:


How I Did It and What Transpired



Gemma presented the initial data:

66-year-old female with dysphagia.


Rey Joson asked the participants:

Q. What is your concept of dysphagia?

Answers: Difficulty of swallowing, which may be painful or not.

Q. What are the organs/systems involved in dysphagia?

Answers: oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, esophagus, and proximal stomach.

Q. What cues which you can use to determine the location of the cause of the dysphagia?

After some discussion, the group decided that if the difficulty occurs before or during swallowing, the problem is at the oral cavity, oropharynx, and hypopharynx. If the difficulty occurs after swallowing, the problem is at the esophagus and proximal stomach level.

Q. Gemma, can you provide us with data on this?

A: Difficulty occurs after swallowing.

Q: So, our consideration is that the problem is at the level of the esophagus or proximal stomach. If there is an esophageal disorder, what are considerations? What is/are most/more common and least common cause of dysphagia caused by an esophageal disorder?

A:

Q. Is there a characteristic pattern of dysphagia that is diagnostic of the different causes?

A. After some discussion, consensus is NONE.

Q. When do you suspect the different causes?

A.

Q. Gemma, can you provide us with the data we need? When is the onset? What is the characteristic of the dysphagia?

A. Onset: 4 years - cannot tolerate solid; 3-years - cannot tolerate liquids. Weight loss. No ingestion of foreign body nor corrosive substances. No history of chronic heartburns.

Q. What are your considerations based on the data on hand?

A. Consensus: primary diagnosis: esophageal cancer; secondary diagnosis: achalasia.

Q. What physical findings will tell you that the diagnosis should be esophageal cancer or should be achalasia?

A. Presence of palpable mass on the neck and lymph nodes will point to esophageal cancer. There are no physical signs for achalasia.

Gemma: No mass observed and palpated in the patient. Wt: 42 kg.


Rey Joson asked: Do you need a paraclinical diagnostic procedure? Yes, why? No, why?

A. Not sure of the diagnosis because we based it on prevalence. Also the treatment plan is different. Resection for cancer; esophagomyotomy for achalasia. Thus, we need a paraclinical diagnostic procedure.

Q. What is the most cost-effective paraclinical diagnostic procedure?

Answers:

Objective: To be more definite on the diagnosis of esophageal cancer

Options

Benefits

Risks

Cost

Availability

Endoscopy and biopsy

Direct and definite - 95% yield

discomfort of scope

Php 3000

Readily available

Barium swallow

Indirect - below 90%

radiation

Php 2000

Readily available

CT scan

Indirect - below 90%

radiation

Php 3000

Not readily available

Decision: Endoscopy with biopsy

Q. Gemma, was an endoscopy done?

A: Yes. There was a ulcerative lesion at 20 cm (about the middle 3rd of the thoracic esophagus). The biopsy showed squamous cell carcinoma.

Q. What is the next step?

A. Determine the extent of the disease.

Q. How?

A. History - inquire on pulmonary symptoms such as hemoptysis, since the lesion is on the middle 3rd near the tracheobroncial tree.

Gemma: No pulmonary complaints.

Q. What else?

A. Chest x-ray - to see the mediastinum as well as the pulmonary parenchyma.

Gemma showing the chest x-ray: There is a superior mediastinal mass. No evident parenchymal nodules to suggest pulmonary mets.

Q. Anything else you want to do?

A. Bronchoscopy or CT scan.

Q. Which is the most cost-effective? Which one will you choose in determining the extent of the tumor?

Options

Benefits

Risks

Cost

Availability

Bronchoscopy

Direct visualization but limited to tracheobronchial tree

discomfort of scope

Php 3000

Readily available

CT scan

Indirect (imaging) but may evaluate esophageal lesion and adjacent major vessels, pericardium, tracheobronchial tree, mediastinal nodes, and lung parenchyma

radiation

Php 3000

Not readily available

Decision: CT Scan

Gemma: CT Scan shows distortion of the tracheobronchial tree with mediastinal nodes.

Q. Is esophageal lesion resectable or worth resecting?

A: No

Q. So, what will be the goal in the treatment?

A: Palliative. To enable the patient to swallow and eat before she dies.

Q. How?

A. By-pass. Cervical esophagus to stomach through a mediastinal tunneling.

Q. How do you prepare the patient for the operation?

A.

Q. How do you build up the nutrition of the patient?

A. Choice between total parenteral nutrition and tube enterostomy

Gemma, we were able to insert an NGT. Through this the nutrition of the patient was improved. After 2-3 weeks, a bypass operation was done.

Q. What will be the long-term follow-up of this patient?

A. Palliative care - symptom-directed.


Questions and Comments from Readers

(You can use the text area below and then press the "submit" button or
you can email me your questions and comments.)

rjoson@pacific.net.ph



Directory of Facilitating Learning Sessions